In this 3-minute video, we break down the Patrick Cox Asia Limited v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue Court of Appeal ruling, a landmark decision that reshapes how royalty income and upfront payments are taxed in Hong Kong. This case introduces a new opportunity for businesses to apportion their income, offering potential savings on cross-border operations.

Key Takeaways:
• Offshore apportionment of royalty income is now a real opportunity for businesses.
• Learn how this ruling can redefine your tax strategy and unlock savings.
• The importance of documenting profit-producing activities to optimize tax treatment.

Whether you're managing intellectual property or navigating international licensing, this case is a call to action to revisit your tax strategies.

Seeking for the latest tax information? Want to know how to deal with Tax Investigation by Hong Kong IRD? Henry Kwong & its professional tax team will help you understand the latest tax policy, and company face changes in the business environment, in order to improve corporate profits. Welcome to subscribe to our channel or follow us on Facebook. You can also visit our website, which contains monthly updated tax news, videos and articles to keep abreast of the latest tax information. 


Appeal on Royalty Income

The Patrick Cox ruling changes the rules on royalty taxation. Offshore apportionment is now a real opportunity.

Redefine your tax strategy. Apportion income and unlock savings with the latest court ruling.

Welcome to our latest tax insights. Today, we explore a landmark Court of Appeal decision that’s reshaping Hong Kong’s tax landscape. From royalty income apportionment to upfront payments, this case has major implications for businesses operating across borders. Let’s dive into segment 1 and 3 of the ruling. 

In October 2024, the Court of Appeal issued a pivotal ruling in Patrick Cox Asia Limited v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue. The case focused on how income from trademark sub-licensing should be taxed. The income streams in question included a GBP 500,000 upfront payment for granting sub-licensing rights and HKD 16.7 million in royalties earned from agreements with Japanese companies.

The court upheld that the upfront payment was taxable in Hong Kong. This was based on the fact that the agreements generating this income were negotiated and signed locally, firmly linking the source of this income to Hong Kong. This reinforced the principle that the location of profit-producing activities determines the source of income—not the location of the payer.

However, the court took a different approach to the royalty income. Earlier decisions classified all HKD 16.7 million as Hong Kong-sourced, but the Court of Appeal disagreed. It noted that significant parts of the profit-producing activities, including marketing and contract management, occurred in Japan. The court ruled that the royalties should be apportioned between Hong Kong and offshore sources based on the activities contributing to the income. This landmark decision introduces a new dimension to how cross-border income is assessed in Hong Kong​​​.

This decision has far-reaching implications for businesses engaged in licensing or sub-licensing arrangements. It highlights the need to examine where profit-producing activities occur. The ruling emphasizes that the actual operations behind income generation, such as marketing, negotiations, and management—must be carefully documented to determine the correct tax treatment.

For businesses with cross-border operations, this is an opportunity to claim offshore exemptions for income tied to activities performed outside Hong Kong. Apportionment allows you to reduce your tax exposure by demonstrating that not all profits are onshore-sourced. However, achieving this requires meticulous documentation. Agreements must clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of each jurisdiction, and records must show the geographic breakdown of operations. Without this, taxpayers risk losing potential offshore claims or facing greater scrutiny from the Inland Revenue Department.

This ruling also serves as a call to action for businesses managing intellectual property or international licensing arrangements. Now is the time to reassess your tax strategies and optimize your operations. By aligning your agreements and documentation with the court’s emphasis on profit-producing activities, you can turn these new rules into a competitive advantage. Proactive planning will not only ensure compliance but also unlock potential savings​​​.

The Court of Appeal’s decision is a turning point for Hong Kong businesses. With the introduction of income apportionment, companies now have a powerful tool to manage tax obligations across borders. Whether you’re refining your tax strategy or exploring new exemptions, this is the time to act. Contact us today to navigate this new era of Hong Kong tax law.